Monday, January 16, 2012
The result of all this free and far-below-minimum-wage professional work is journal articles in which the publisher, which has done almost nothing, owns the copyright and is able to sell copies back to libraries at monopolistic costs, and to individuals at $30 or more per view. What is surprising is how complicit scientists are in perpetuating this feudal system. The RWA is noisily supported by the Association of American Publishers, which has as members more than 50 scholarly societies – including, ironically, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, which by its implicit support of the RWA is making itself an association for the retardation of science.

Academic publishers have become the enemies of science | Dr Mike Taylor | Science | guardian.co.uk

Michael Eisen gives his two cents,

We (my colleagues at PLoS and many others) have spent over a decade fighting to secure public access to publicly funded research. We finally start to make some progress – imperfect as the NIH Public Access Policy is, it is an important step in the right direction. And what happens? A member of Congress who faces no threat of defeat in the upcoming election disgracefully sells out the public good in exchange for some measly campaign contributions, and then doesn’t even have the decency to defend her actions with her own thoughts and words.

Read the rest of his blog post here.

Support the Public Library of Science

Notes

  1. eightyeightmph reblogged this from slantback
  2. noosphere reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  3. pushinghoopswithsticks reblogged this from thenoobyorker
  4. stopthecyborgs reblogged this from thenoobyorker
  5. thenoobyorker reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  6. zenodotus5 reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  7. geofaultline reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  8. infoneer-pulse reblogged this from slantback
  9. slantback posted this